Fail Safe Versus Fail Secure Locks Explained

    What happens to each lock type when power is cut, and why the choice depends on the door

    Not sure if your locks are fail safe or fail secure?

    We support sites across Gillingham, Tonbridge, Chislehurst and the wider Kent and Medway area, helping confirm lock behaviour against your fire risk assessment and fitting the right hardware where changes are needed. Call 01634 944161.

    No call centres, a real engineer answers.

    One of the most important decisions in any access control installation is not the fob reader or the keypad, it is what the lock does the moment power is removed. Fail safe and fail secure describe two opposite behaviours, and mixing them up on the wrong door can create either a security gap or, more seriously, a barrier to escape.

    The terms sound similar but mean almost opposite things. A fail safe lock releases and allows the door to be opened when power is lost, while a fail secure lock stays locked until power is restored. Both are correct choices in the right situation, and the same building often uses a mix of the two depending on what each door is protecting and how it fits into the escape strategy.

    This page sets out the practical differences in plain terms, gives examples of where each type is typically used, and explains why the final decision on a fire escape door should always sit with your fire risk assessment and a competent engineer rather than being guessed at.

    What This Decision Comes Down To

    Uncertainty over why a door unlocks itself during a power cut
    A door that stays locked during a power failure when it was expected to open
    Confusion when comparing a maglock to an electric strike on different doors
    A fire risk assessment flagging a lock type as unsuitable for its location
    New tenants or staff asking why doors behave differently around the building

    How to Decide for Your Property

    1

    Identify which locks are on which doors

    Walk around the building and note where maglocks, electric strikes or motor locks are fitted. This gives you a starting point for discussing with an engineer whether each is set up appropriately for its location.

    2

    Check your fire risk assessment for guidance on escape doors

    Your fire risk assessment should indicate which doors form part of an escape route and any requirements around how they release. If this has not been reviewed recently, it is worth raising with whoever holds responsibility for it.

    3

    Ask your access control provider which type is fitted where

    A straightforward question to your installer or maintenance contractor, asking them to confirm fail safe or fail secure status for each controlled door, gives you a clear record without needing to test anything yourself.

    4

    Note any doors where the behaviour seems unexpected

    If a door unlocks when you did not expect it to, or stays locked when you thought it should release, write down which door and when this happened so an engineer can investigate the cause.

    Where Each Option Wins and Loses

    A maglock fitted where fail secure behaviour was needed

    Magnetic locks are almost always fail safe by design, meaning they release on loss of power. This is usually the right choice for a fire escape door but can be an unwanted gap in security on a door meant to remain locked at all times.

    An electric strike or motor lock chosen for the wrong purpose

    Electric strikes and many motorised locks can be configured as fail secure, staying locked without power. This suits a store room or plant area but is generally unsuitable for a designated escape route unless other release provisions are in place.

    A building with a mix of lock types and no clear record

    Larger sites often use different lock behaviours on different doors, which is entirely normal, but without an up to date record it becomes difficult for staff or a fire risk assessor to confirm each door is set up correctly.

    Confusion between fail safe and fail secure terminology

    The two terms are easy to mix up because they sound like opposites of the same idea rather than describing two entirely separate default states. This confusion sometimes leads to the wrong lock being specified during a refit.

    Local authority or insurer requirements affecting certain doors

    Some premises, particularly those with specific security or fire safety obligations, have requirements about how particular doors must behave on power loss, which should be reflected in the lock choice made at installation.

    When to Get an Engineer's Opinion

    Any door forming part of an escape route needs its lock type confirmed and, if necessary, changed by a competent engineer, never adjusted informally
    You are unsure whether a fitted lock is fail safe or fail secure and need this confirmed before a fire risk assessment review
    A refit or refurbishment is changing how a door is used, which may mean the existing lock type is no longer appropriate
    You want to add or change a lock on a door and are not sure which behaviour it should have
    A fire risk assessor or building control inspector has raised a query about a specific door's lock behaviour

    Getting it right first time

    Decisions about fail safe versus fail secure locks on escape routes sit with your fire risk assessment and the responsible person for the building, so always have these confirmed and, where changes are needed, installed by a competent engineer rather than assumed from the lock's appearance.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Fail Safe Versus Fail Secure Locks Explained: common questions

    Need Security or WiFi Help Fast?

    Alarm installation, CCTV, access control, WiFi and repairs across Kent & South East London. Call, WhatsApp or send a message for a free quote.